Brilliant Greenpeace video on Chernobyl

	Duration: 300 seconds Upload Time: 06-04-21 06:18:17 User: gpvideo :::: Favorites
Description: "20 years ago: Chernobyl" is a fast moving short film - like a music video - about the Chernobyl disaster and Greenpeace anti-nuke campaign. Film by Christoph Schwaiger. 3D animation by Tanooki. Archive material by Penninger archive. Music by Yap music. Production by Yap films. Visit the Greenpeace website for more information or to sign the "No More Chernobyls" petition. Share with friends
Comments
Babunar ::: Favorites <<Continued from below>> The only way forward is nuclear power. Technology, and safety, have come on a long way since this accident, and will continue to improve the more we embrace nuclear power. Thanks for your time, Ben 07-07-20 14:44:29 _____________________________________________________
Maycorp ::: Favorites i say if u want to b safe from the dangers of nuclear and u wanna still b havin electricity coal power is the only way, its all very nice havin ur windmill producing 0.5mwh but that never gonna power nothin, coal is cheap and theres lots of it, animals produce more CO2 than humans but yet green people still insist on savin every monkey from a couple of old tree in amazon 07-07-21 00:27:27 _____________________________________________________
DrBuzz0 ::: Favorites This does not show the dangers of a nuclear power plant. It shows the dangers of a very poorly designed, neglegantly operated, inherently unsafe nuclear power plant. Using Cherbobyl as an example of what nuclear energy is is like using the Hindenburg as an example of air travel. 07-07-23 20:23:27 _____________________________________________________
q83 ::: Favorites Yeah, sorry but no. The most environmentally friendly form of electricity is hydro-electricity. I've done studies back in my university days (engineering) where I've read that the Co2 cost for hydro is LESS than solar or wind (these costs are related to production, as well as many other factors). Keep in mind, however, that to produce a lot of power, they need a LOT of space, which usually involves deforestation amongst other things (see the James Bay Project in Quebec, for example). 07-07-24 04:34:12 _____________________________________________________
q83 ::: Favorites And also, Chernobyl was a disaster due to some very stupid people. Control rods that don't fit into a reactor properly... maybe they should have checked that before testing the capacity of the reactor? 07-07-24 04:35:57 _____________________________________________________
Maycorp ::: Favorites im not against nuclear i was just sayin that was the only solution if there was no nuclear 07-07-24 18:07:02 _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
emptyhand17 ::: Favorites So last week an earthquake hit a Japanese nuclear power plant, causing a significant release of radiation. 20 years on and doesn't sound very safe to me Doesn't 07-07-24 18:24:08 _____________________________________________________
DelfinoDelphis ::: Favorites nuclear free future - and then we have coal plants which kill much more and are much more radioactive... 07-07-28 14:17:43 _____________________________________________________
Spargelpfluecker ::: Favorites what the hell are you talking about??? technology for zero-co2-coal-plant is existing - its just the difference of 200 000 Euro acquisition of nuclear to coal power plant 07-07-28 16:37:57 _____________________________________________________
Spargelpfluecker ::: Favorites lucky - with Krümmel and Bruhnsbüttel (Germany) the end of the lieng atomic-lobby has come. Good luck for the stupid french. Who will pay the desaster, after all the money was earned by the nuclear murderers??? The people! Their children will die and their money will be used for "reparation". "Thanks that its the bad news we read every day. It means, that the bad and evil is still the exception in life." 07-07-28 16:43:20 _____________________________________________________